Celebrity
Power
Overview
Sean “P. Diddy” Combs is a music mogul and a
business leader. Some of his income comes from endorsements
for ProActiv
and Pepsi. This lesson discusses what happened when two endorsements
come into conflict.
Objective
Students will accomplish the following:
-
Describe the persuasive
techniques used by Pepsi and ProActiv
-
Identify who the
intended audience is for the advertisements
-
Explain why
they would buy or not buy the article
-
Write about how
they would rule on the lawsuit
Standards Addressed
Language Arts — Writing
Communications:
Oral and Visual, Listening and Viewing — Benchmark
B
Grades 8, 9 and 10
02. Identify and analyze
the persuasive techniques (e.g., bandwagon, testimonial,
glittering generalities, emotional
word repetition
and bait and switch) used in presentations and media messages.
03. Determine the credibility of the speaker
(e.g., hidden agendas, slanted or biased material) and recognize
fallacies
of reasoning used in presentations and media messages.
Procedure
-
Have students work in pairs.
-
Distribute the written story
about P. Diddy and the assignment sheet.
-
Either discuss
or show the Pepsi commercial featuring P. Diddy, which
is accessible online using a simple search.
The rap star’s
Proactiv commercial has raw language, but it and the Pepsi
commercial are described in general in the P. Diddy story.
-
Ask the students what they know about P. Diddy, Proactiv
and Pepsi.
-
Have them answer the questions in the Product
Comparison handout.
-
After about 20 minutes, discuss the
following:
The persuasive technique in the Proactiv ad
is endorsement or testimonial.
For Pepsi, the techniques
are endorsement, testimonial, bandwagon and snob
appeal.
How
credible P. Diddy is as a spokesman for these
products.
For
Proactiv, he can tell how it worked for him,
but he cannot speak with authority as to the validity
of
his claim.
For Pepsi, he can tell how he liked it that
others wanted to buy a Pepsi truck and be “cool” like
him, so this works with him as a spokesperson.
What
verdict would the students make if they had
to make a judgment on P. Diddy’s case against
Proactiv?
Evaluation
| Correctly named technique being used |
10 points each |
20 points |
| Used reasoning on credibility |
5 points each |
10 points |
| Gave a statement about judgment on ruling |
10 points each |
20 points |
| |
TOTAL 50 points |
|